Gary,
The 12 May update has created a fair amount of debate on fan sites
especially the e-bay bit. It would be useful for us fans to know what
items on e-bay recently you are cheesed off about so that those who are
trading genuinly with little or no money changing hands know what is and
is not acceptable to yourselves.
I have just destroyed two fabulous Tubeway Tapes that were as good as
the so called Roxy tape (It wasn't the Roxy as you know) and I did so on
the back of this nonsense that you think some of us who have been around
the scene so long are making loads of money out of you. I for one have
not made loads of cash out of you over the years despite what you
think. As a long time fan I have however spent thousands and in my own
silly way trying to promote the Numan we grew to love on many occasions
running Numan disco's, fanzines etc at a loss paid for (in part) out of
trading Numan material that would never have been commercially
released. Something that virtually any artistes fans past and present
have done and will no doubt continue to do.
Don't piss off those fans you have left. Make new music, good music and
win them over. Yes it's only a handful of whingers that moan about you
and I am one of them recently however we have been round long enough to
see past the bullshit. You are a business and have the right to do and
say what you think is right and I for one have no problem with that but
likewise we too have the right to vote with our cash and not buy the
product anymore. That said we will probably still buy the albums unless
it's the tenth version of Jagged Halo with a few extra photoshop
manipulated images on it or whatever.
Do the items on e-bay really cost you a fortune in lost revenue? Do the
genuine fans really buy the crap like Numan coasters in enough volume to
damage your image? I won't buy that rubbish and neither will most
fans. I will however buy the Peel sessions, Wembley DVD copied from the
Video or Laserdiscs of the originals until you release the genuine
article which I will still buy (So you still don't lose).
I'm a fan, a collector (Or was)
End of rant
Regards
Gary Skint
(Gary Numan replies) I have added this e-mail, depressing though it is, and my response to this Feedback page to make clear my thoughts on such things and to make sure that anyone else who may
think as Mr Skint does fully understands how I see it. So:
First of all, Mr Gary Skint, you say a number of things that have obviously come from other places and most definitely NOT from my mouth, pen or keyboard. So, where do I start?
I have never, repeat NEVER, thought, said, or written that some fans that have been around for a long time are making loads of money out of me. If I'm not making loads of money out
of me, which I'm not, then it's ridiculous to believe that any fans are. For you to have destroyed 'two fabulous Tubeway tapes' seems to me a very unneccesary thing
to have done. I have autographed EVERY SINGLE BOOTLEG offered to me for a signature since I first set foot into a studio, more than a quarter of a century ago. I do not
have a problem with people owning bootlegs, swapping them with other like minded fans, even selling them on once in a while when things, perhaps, get a bit tight financially. As
I said in the News item that seems to have upset you so much, we turn a blind eye to most things, but how far do you go?
I didn't say that the things on E-Bay cost me a fortune so I don't know why you've said that. I didn't say that anything being sold was damaging my image. I didn't even mention Numan
coasters, in fact I didn't even know about Numan coasters, but maybe
we should make some of our own if people like them. You seem to be reacting as though my News item was meant directly at you personally. I also assume that, as you say it seems to
have 'created a fair amount of debate on fan sites', that other people are also reacting as though it was meant directly for them. It wasn't.
The problem with people thinking that my comments are intended directly for them, apart from being just a little bit wierdly self important, is that it stops them from looking at what I'm
actually talking about. I'm a decent human being and I think I have proven time and time again over the last 25 years that I will bend over backwards to make sure that fans are not ripped
off. After all, it was me that just stopped the release of the Artful Records Resonator album because, amongst other things, it seemed to me like a fan rip off. Do you have any idea how
much money I turned away when I did that? I care very deeply for my fans, new and old, and especially after such a long and topsy turvy career, and it pains me to read ill informed comments
such as yours Mr Skint, and I'm quite sure you're not alone. The fact is I don't give a shit about people selling
Numan coasters, unless they're selling thouands. I don't give a shit about people flogging their single copy of the Shepherds Bush 2004 Numan DVD, wish I had one myself if truth
be told. What I do care about is, for example, someone who creates an mp3 CD of every single track I've ever released and starts to manufacture them to order.
That is going just a little too far. Or someone, or some organisation, that records or films a gig and then sells as many copies of that recording as they possibly can, for a small fortune,
in front of my bloody nose, as on E-Bay.
There is a world of difference between a fan selling parts of their collection of Numan stuff and a budding, or successful, entreprenuer. In my opinion, any Numan fan
that is interested enough to buy a poor quality bootleg will absolutely buy the legal stuff as well. I love fans for that and they will never have a problem with me. That's why I'm always happy
to sign bootleg albums, posters, t-shirts, whatever. The entreprenuer is another matter. The small time entreprenuer, as in our mp3 man, is a bit of a worry. The successful entreprenuer
is a huge worry and yes, it can have a big effect on my sales. Please bear in mind that not every fan is a keen collector and therefore guaranteed to buy everything, legal or otherwise.
If the quality of a bootleg is high, and many of them are now very high indeed, then a number of scary possibilities become relevant. For example, the DVD that I'm just about to release
has cost a lot of money and taken me, and several other people, a great deal of time to get ready. To commit to an official, quality DVD release is a big gamble financially, especially
for an artist in my position who has very limited sales. In the futue, if a high quality bootleg of a gig, a gig that we also film for a DVD or record for a live album, was also made
easily available then it would create a clear and undeniable impact on our potential sales. The hard core collector fans will
probably buy both. The others will choose between the two. Some, perhaps many, may choose the bootleg and, if so, we have a problem. Faced with that kind of competition on such a limited number
of fans we quite probably won't sell enough to get our money back and so a new predicament presents itself. In that situation, what do we do next? Do we try again and attempt to create
another reasonably expensive and highest quality DVD only to see another bootleg steal away many of our sales, or, do we think, 'Sod it,
lets make them cheaply', along the lines of making our own bootleg in a way, and so do away with the need for risking large sums of money and accept that fans will now be offered cheaper
and nastier versions of what could have been done. Such a situation would not do the fans any good, it wouldn't do me any good but it wouldn't bother the bootlegger in the slightest.
And such a situation is entirely possible, even likely. It's this
level of bootlegging, and this type of individual or organisation, that we are primarily trying to stop. Plus, it's also worth
remembering that, as I said in the News item, we aren't looking to get anyone into trouble so why people are upset is beyond me. What a strange world we live in when the person who
is the victim, which is me when it comes to flogging illegal Numan material, can get criticised for politely asking people to stop doing it.
You state 'Don't piss off the fans you have left'. By doing what exactly? By asking them to help me stop the more extreme bootleggers of my music? Do you honestly think that they're leaving in
droves at the very thought of helping me and my career? I don't. I seem to have far more faith and respect for my fans than you Mr Skint and I am quite convinced that, apart from the few
that I've 'offended', the majority are only too happy to help when and where they can. That has been my experience throughout my career. Most fans seem to want the best for me. You
seem to imply that I have scant few fans remaining and, apart from the fact that you think they will all abandon me if I continue to frown on large capacity bootleggers, you clearly
recognise that their numbers are not as great as they once were, albeit slowly improving for the last few years I have to say. Which makes your attitude all the more baffling. With a limited fan
base I am very susceptible to income damage caused by bootleggers. You say that you 'have the right to vote with your cash and not buy the product anymore', referring to new material.
Are you seriously threatening that you will consider not buying a new Gary Numan album if I continue to try and stop the next bootlegging syndicate from taking advantage of me? Shame
on you, but do as you must.
I sometimes wonder if some people assume I'm very wealthy and, as such, have no right to feel aggrieved when someone effectively steals what is mine. That's an appallingly selfish
attitude. When a man comes to my
shows, a man who is probably not and never has been a fan, secretly records or films the gig and then sells his copies to fans, that man is stealing from me and that is the man I want to stop.
I am not wealthy. I lost my fortune two decades ago and although things are going better now it doesn't take too much mathematical ability to work out that I made less money out of
5,000 Rip singles than I did out of over 1,000,000 Are Friends Electric's. I probably make more money than someone working at MacDonalds, no offence intended it's just an example,
but I am not a rich man and it pains me to see thousands of bootleg albums being sold and not a penny coming to me. My songwriting talent is all I have to keep me and my family
fed until I die. Making records and playing live shows are my sole sources of income and I absolutely have to protect that. Especially these days when sales overall are so low that record
companies as huge as EMI are going bust and dropping large numbers of artists. I doubt any one of you, those that have been offended by my news item or not, would welcome a stranger
taking a few quid from your wage packet each week but that's what bootlegging does to me. It isn't right, it isn't fair and I have every right to do what I can to minimise its excesses.
And by that, as most people apart from you and your 'offended' partners seemed to realise Mr Skint, I do not mean by picking on fans for owning 'Tubeway' tapes but by stopping people
that try to make reasonable, if not substantial, amounts of money by selling stuff of mine that is not rightfully and legally theirs to sell.
It's a great shame that these same 'offended' people aren't gracious or realistic enough to recognise that I am, and have always been, entirely tolerant and completely understanding
of fans and their bootleg collections and have never made any moves, legal or otherwise, to harrass them throughout my entire career. Quite the opposite in fact, witnessed by several
thousand autographs on a wide range of dodgy items over the years. What a great shame that these 'offended' people aren't supporting me, the artist they claim to be a fan of, by helping
to stop the people that steal directly from me. It's a strange fan indeed that fights to support the very thing that's harming my career and my livelihood. Perhaps that's a fan I could do without,
even though, as My Skint implies, I may only have a few left.
I can only hazard a guess and assume that almost everything you said in your e-mail was based on some of the more extreme and unfriendly 'discussions' that seem to plague some fan
web sites these days. Every other musician I speak to seems to have the same small corner of spitefulness running through every discussion subject you can think of on their own fan sites and I
certainly am no exception to that. It's just an unfortunate part of living in the modern world it seems for people in my position. However, it's a little sad when these peoples comments,
ugly and ill-informed as they are, start to appear on e-mails such as yours as though they came from my own mouth. None of the things stated in your e-mail, either things I am supposed to have said
or think, are true and you do me a great disservice by attributing such thoughts to me. I am not one to shy away from saying what I think and if I thought along the lines you claim I
do then you would most certainly have seen it here, on this web site. But you have not, because I do not think the way you say I do. If a fan can sell off his Numan collection, including
bootlegs, and put the money towards a new car, a new toy for his kid or whatever, good luck to him. If that same fan films a gig and trys to sell hundreds of copies or more on E-bay, or
anywhere else for that matter, I'll try to stop him. With a friendly and polite phone call at first. That's what I think. In plain English for all to see. If anyone finds that offensive
I couldn't care less.
By the way, I would like to point out to you Mr Gary Skint, that not putting a return address on your semi anonymous e-mail (unless your name is Gary Skint of course) does you and your
opinions no credit whatsoever. Any man, or woman, that doesn't have the backbone to say who they are, and where we can contact them, doesn't warrent much respect from me. If you feel
justified in what you are saying, at least have the courage to stand up and be counted. It seems that writing things from the 'anonymous' camp is another miserable step forward, or
should that be backwards, in the values of our 'modern' society. Shameful.
Gary Numan.
(The News Item that sparked this off is repeated below in full)
E-BAY AND BEYOND (May 12, 2004)
We've noticed an ever increasing flow of illegal items turning up on E-Bay, and elsewhere, over the last year or so. As you know, generally speaking, we feel
that a certain amount of bootleg material being available is not too big a problem and we turn a blind eye to it. However, things do seem to be getting worse and so we are now taking steps
to protect ourselves from the more ambitious groups and individuals out there. So, if anyone becomes aware of any illegal items being offered for sale, we would be very grateful if you
could let us know about it, using our E-mail page, as soon as possible. We aren't looking to get anyone into trouble, we're simply trying to stop
it growing out of control.